new jersey: was angry with new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents team
Weight: 0.71
, new york city
Weight: 0.67
, new york
Weight: 0.67
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings bergen
Weight: 0.46
, football team
Weight: 0.36
, basketball team
Weight: 0.35
, baseball team
Weight: 0.34
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was angry with new york 1.00
be better than new york 0.89
be cheaper than new york 0.85
be much cooler than new york 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new jersey, was angry with new york)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(new jersey, was angry with new york)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new jersey, was angry with new york)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new jersey, be better than new york)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new jersey, was angry with new york)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(new jersey, be cheaper than new york)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new jersey, was angry with new york)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new jersey, be better than new york)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new jersey, was angry with new york)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(new jersey, be cheaper than new york)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(new jersey, was angry with new york)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(new jersey, be better than new york)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(new jersey, was angry with new york)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(new jersey, be cheaper than new york)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(new jersey, was angry with new york)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, be cheaper than new york)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(new jersey, was angry with new york)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, be better than new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(new jersey, was angry with new york)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new jersey, was angry with new york)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, was angry with new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new jersey, was angry with new york)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new jersey, was angry with new york)