new jersey: were similar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents team
Weight: 0.71
, new york city
Weight: 0.67
, new york
Weight: 0.67
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings bergen
Weight: 0.46
, football team
Weight: 0.36
, basketball team
Weight: 0.35
, baseball team
Weight: 0.34
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were similar 1.00
be different 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new york, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new jersey, were similar)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york city, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new jersey, were similar)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new england, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new jersey, were similar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new york, were similar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new england, be different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york city, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new york, were similar)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new england, be different)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new york, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new jersey, were similar)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york city, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new jersey, were similar)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new england, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new jersey, were similar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(new jersey, were similar)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(new jersey, be different)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, be different)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new jersey, be different)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(new jersey, be different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, were similar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new jersey, were similar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new england, be different)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new york, were similar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(new york city, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new england, be different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new york, were similar)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new jersey, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(new york city, be different)