new mexico: was acquired by usa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents texas
Weight: 0.74
, mexico
Weight: 0.73
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, country
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nevada
Weight: 0.68
, los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.67
, san diego
Weight: 0.67
, colorado
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
was acquired by usa 1.00
was acquired 0.86
was purchased from mexico 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(texas, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new mexico, was acquired by usa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(texas, was acquired)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(texas, was acquired)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(california, was acquired)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(texas, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new mexico, was acquired by usa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(california, was acquired)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(new mexico, was acquired by usa)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new mexico, was acquired)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new mexico, was purchased from mexico)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was purchased from mexico)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new mexico, was purchased from mexico)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new mexico, was acquired)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(new mexico, was acquired)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(new mexico, was purchased from mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired by usa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new mexico, was acquired by usa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(texas, was acquired)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(california, was acquired)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new mexico, was acquired by usa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(texas, was acquired)