new orleans: be weak to hurricanes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.68
, hurricane
Weight: 0.68
, texas
Weight: 0.67
, memphis
Weight: 0.67
Siblings mardi gras
Weight: 0.66
, washington
Weight: 0.62
, minnesota
Weight: 0.57
, gumbo
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be weak to hurricanes 1.00
be prone to hurricanes 0.90
be susceptible to hurricanes 0.89
was affected badly by hurricane katrina 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be prone to hurricanes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be susceptible to hurricanes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(new orleans, be prone to hurricanes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(new orleans, be susceptible to hurricanes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be susceptible to hurricanes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be prone to hurricanes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(new orleans, be susceptible to hurricanes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(new orleans, be prone to hurricanes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)