new orleans: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.68
, hurricane
Weight: 0.68
, texas
Weight: 0.67
, memphis
Weight: 0.67
Siblings mardi gras
Weight: 0.66
, washington
Weight: 0.62
, minnesota
Weight: 0.57
, gumbo
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
be great place visit 0.80
be called big easy 0.78
be good place have 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, is great)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(new orleans, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(texas, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(texas, is great)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, is great)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(new orleans, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(new orleans, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(new orleans, be great place visit)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(new orleans, be called big easy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(new orleans, be great place visit)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(new orleans, be good place have)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be great place visit)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(new orleans, be good place have)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be good place have)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be called big easy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(new orleans, be called big easy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be called big easy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be great place visit)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be good place have)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(new orleans, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(texas, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(new orleans, is great)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(texas, is great)