new south wales: be instead of wales

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.64
, region
Weight: 0.64
, new zealand
Weight: 0.63
, colony
Weight: 0.62
, state
Weight: 0.61
Siblings brisbane
Weight: 0.60
, south carolina
Weight: 0.37
, south dakota
Weight: 0.37
, north carolina
Weight: 0.37
, north dakota
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be instead of wales 1.00
be instead of new wales 0.98
be named wales 0.89
be named new wales 0.88
be named south wales 0.87
be named new south wales 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(new south wales, be instead of wales)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new south wales, be instead of new wales)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new south wales, be instead of new wales)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(new south wales, be named wales)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new south wales, be named new wales)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(new south wales, be instead of new wales)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new south wales, be named south wales)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new south wales, be named new south wales)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new south wales, be named south wales)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new south wales, be named new south wales)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new south wales, be named wales)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new south wales, be named new wales)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(new south wales, be instead of new wales)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(new south wales, be named south wales)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new south wales, be named new south wales)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(new south wales, be named wales)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new south wales, be named new wales)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(new south wales, be named south wales)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(new south wales, be named wales)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(new south wales, be named new south wales)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(new south wales, be named new wales)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new south wales, be instead of wales)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new south wales, be instead of wales)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new south wales, be instead of wales)