new york city: be nicknamed apple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.90
, town
Weight: 0.73
, new england
Weight: 0.73
, city
Weight: 0.72
Siblings brooklyn bridge
Weight: 0.72
, empire state building
Weight: 0.69
, ellis island
Weight: 0.69
, albany
Weight: 0.68
, african american
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be nicknamed apple 1.00
be nicknamed big apple 0.98
be known as apple 0.86
be called apple 0.86
be known as big apple 0.85
be called big apple 0.84
be referred as big apple 0.84
is big apple 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(new york, be called big apple)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(new york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(city, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(city, be called apple)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(new york, be referred as big apple)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(city, be known as apple)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(new york, be called big apple)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(city, be called apple)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as big apple)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(new york, be called big apple)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(new york, be called big apple)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(new york, be referred as big apple)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(city, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(new york city, be nicknamed apple)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be nicknamed big apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be called apple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york city, be known as apple)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new york city, be referred as big apple)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be called big apple)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called apple)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, is big apple)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called apple)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(new york city, be called apple)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed big apple)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed big apple)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be referred as big apple)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new york city, be known as apple)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(new york city, be referred as big apple)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called big apple)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called big apple)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be known as apple)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(new york city, be nicknamed big apple)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(new york city, is big apple)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is big apple)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(new york city, be referred as big apple)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(new york city, be known as apple)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(new york city, be called big apple)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(new york city, is big apple)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(city, be nicknamed apple)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(city, be called apple)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as big apple)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(city, be known as apple)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york, be called big apple)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(city, be nicknamed apple)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(city, be called apple)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(city, be known as apple)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as big apple)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york, be called big apple)