new york city: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.90
, town
Weight: 0.73
, new england
Weight: 0.73
, city
Weight: 0.72
Siblings brooklyn bridge
Weight: 0.72
, empire state building
Weight: 0.69
, ellis island
Weight: 0.69
, albany
Weight: 0.68
, african american
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
be named same as state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(new york city, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be named same as state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(new york city, be named same as state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(new york city, be named same as state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(new york city, be named same as state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)