new york: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york city
Weight: 0.90
, america
Weight: 0.72
, chicago
Weight: 0.72
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.73
, washington
Weight: 0.71
, las vegas
Weight: 0.70
, new yorker
Weight: 0.68
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00
was created 0.84
was established 0.83
was founded in 1664 0.81
was founded in 1609 0.81
was founded 0.81
was developed 0.79
was called in 1601 0.79
was old founded 0.78
was started 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chicago, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chicago, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new york city, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york city, was started)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new england, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chicago, was established)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chicago, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was established)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was started)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(washington, was established)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, was founded)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chicago, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chicago, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new york city, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was formed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was created)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(las vegas, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(las vegas, was founded)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(philadelphia, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was established)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was founded)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(washington, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(washington, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(new york, was formed)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, was created)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded in 1609)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded in 1664)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(new york, was old founded)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was started)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(new york, was old founded)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, was developed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(new york, was established)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(new york, was created)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was created)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(new york, was founded in 1664)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(new york, was developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(new york, was started)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(new york, was founded in 1664)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(new york, was founded)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york, was started)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(new york, was developed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new york, was founded in 1609)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded in 1664)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new york, was old founded)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded in 1609)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(new york, was founded in 1609)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york city, was started)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, was established)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chicago, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was formed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(las vegas, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was established)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was founded)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(washington, was established)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york city, was started)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, was established)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chicago, was founded)