new york: was old founded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york city
Weight: 0.90
, america
Weight: 0.72
, chicago
Weight: 0.72
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.73
, washington
Weight: 0.71
, las vegas
Weight: 0.70
, new yorker
Weight: 0.68
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was old founded 1.00
was founded in 1664 0.95
was founded in 1609 0.95
was founded 0.95
was founded in colonial times 0.83
was formed 0.78
was established 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chicago, was founded)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new york, was old founded)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new york, was old founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chicago, was established)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new york, was old founded)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new england, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chicago, was established)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chicago, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was founded)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was founded)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was established)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, was founded)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(washington, was established)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chicago, was founded)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(new york, was old founded)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(new york, was old founded)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chicago, was established)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(new york, was old founded)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(las vegas, was founded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(las vegas, was founded)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was formed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was founded)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was established)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(washington, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(washington, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(new york, was old founded)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(new york, was founded in 1664)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(new york, was founded in 1609)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new york, was founded in colonial times)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded in 1664)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded in colonial times)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded in 1609)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(new york, was formed)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(new york, was founded in 1664)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(new york, was established)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(new york, was founded)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(new york, was founded in colonial times)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new york, was founded in 1609)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded in 1609)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded in colonial times)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded in 1664)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new york, was old founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chicago, was founded)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(las vegas, was founded)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was founded)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was established)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(washington, was established)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chicago, was founded)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(new york, was old founded)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, was established)