new york: was such diverse place in late 1600s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york city
Weight: 0.90
, america
Weight: 0.72
, chicago
Weight: 0.72
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.73
, washington
Weight: 0.71
, las vegas
Weight: 0.70
, new yorker
Weight: 0.68
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was such diverse place in late 1600s 1.00
was such diverse place in 1600s 0.97
is most important place 0.80
be popular place live in 0.78
is important place 0.78
be popular place live 0.77
be different from places 0.77
be great place live 0.75
is place 0.75
be best place live 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(new york city, be popular place live in)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new york city, be popular place live)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(new york city, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(new england, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(new england, be best place live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(new york city, be best place live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(new york city, be popular place live in)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(new york city, be popular place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be popular place live)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be popular place live in)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new england, be best place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be best place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, be great place live)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(new york city, be popular place live in)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new york city, be popular place live)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(new york city, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(new england, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(philadelphia, be great place live)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, be great place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, is most important place)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new york, be popular place live in)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new york, be great place live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(new york, is most important place)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(new york, is most important place)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(new york, be popular place live in)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(new york, is most important place)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(new york, be great place live)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new york, be popular place live in)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(new york, be great place live)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(new york, be popular place live in)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(new york, be great place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(new england, be best place live)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(new york city, be best place live)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(new york city, be popular place live in)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(new york city, be popular place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(philadelphia, be great place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(new england, be best place live)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(new york city, be best place live)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(new york city, be popular place live in)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(new york city, be popular place live)