new yorker: is arrogant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.68
, client
Weight: 0.60
, magazine
Weight: 0.60
, newspaper
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.36
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.33
, new england
Weight: 0.33
, newsweek
Weight: 0.32
, washington
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is arrogant 1.00
is cocky 0.84
is obnoxious 0.80
is rude 0.79
seem rude 0.78
be stereotyped as angry 0.77
is snobby 0.77
is angry 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(client, is rude)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(new yorker, is arrogant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(client, is rude)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, is rude)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(client, is rude)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new yorker, is arrogant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(new yorker, is arrogant)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(new yorker, be stereotyped as angry)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(new yorker, be stereotyped as angry)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(new yorker, be stereotyped as angry)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(new yorker, is angry)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(new yorker, is angry)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(new yorker, is angry)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(new yorker, be stereotyped as angry)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(new yorker, is angry)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new yorker, seem rude)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(new yorker, is rude)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(new yorker, is rude)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(new yorker, is rude)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new yorker, is rude)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new yorker, seem rude)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new yorker, is cocky)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(new yorker, is cocky)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(new yorker, seem rude)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new yorker, is cocky)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(new yorker, seem rude)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(new yorker, is cocky)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(new yorker, is arrogant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(new yorker, is arrogant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(client, is rude)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(new yorker, is arrogant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(client, is rude)