new zealand: be similar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.71
, north america
Weight: 0.70
, europe
Weight: 0.69
, south africa
Weight: 0.69
Siblings new caledonia
Weight: 0.71
, tasmania
Weight: 0.71
, usa
Weight: 0.68
, south korea
Weight: 0.67
, canada
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be similar 1.00
be different 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(europe, be different)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new zealand, be similar)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(european union, be different)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new zealand, be similar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(european union, be different)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(europe, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(europe, be different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(european union, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(south korea, be different)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(canada, be similar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(europe, be different)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new zealand, be similar)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(european union, be different)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new zealand, be similar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(canada, be similar)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(canada, be similar)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(south korea, be different)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(south korea, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(new zealand, be similar)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be different)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new zealand, be different)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(new zealand, be different)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(new zealand, be different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be similar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new zealand, be similar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(european union, be different)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(europe, be different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(south korea, be different)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(canada, be similar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(european union, be different)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(new zealand, be similar)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(europe, be different)