new zealand: was in british empire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.71
, north america
Weight: 0.70
, europe
Weight: 0.69
, south africa
Weight: 0.69
Siblings new caledonia
Weight: 0.71
, tasmania
Weight: 0.71
, usa
Weight: 0.68
, south korea
Weight: 0.67
, canada
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in british empire 1.00
was important to british empire 0.99
was important country to british empire 0.98
britain of south 0.77
be called britain of south 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(south africa, was important country to british empire)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(new zealand, was in british empire)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(south africa, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(new zealand, was in british empire)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(south africa, was important to british empire)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(south africa, was important country to british empire)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(south africa, was important to british empire)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(south africa, was important country to british empire)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(south africa, was important country to british empire)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(south africa, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(new zealand, was in british empire)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was important to british empire)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new zealand, be called britain of south)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(new zealand, britain of south)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(new zealand, be called britain of south)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new zealand, britain of south)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(new zealand, was important to british empire)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(new zealand, be called britain of south)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was important to british empire)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(new zealand, was important to british empire)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(new zealand, britain of south)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be called britain of south)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, britain of south)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was in british empire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(new zealand, was in british empire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(south africa, was important to british empire)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(south africa, was important country to british empire)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(south africa, was important to british empire)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(south africa, was important country to british empire)