newspaper: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents periodical
Weight: 0.64
, television station
Weight: 0.64
, media
Weight: 0.61
, employer
Weight: 0.61
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings paper
Weight: 0.68
, newsweek
Weight: 0.64
, magazine
Weight: 0.64
, herald
Weight: 0.52
, stern
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be at office supply store 0.82
be at on desk 0.78
be at desk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(paper, be at office)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, be at on desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(paper, be at desk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(paper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(paper, be at office)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(paper, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(paper, be at desk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(paper, be at on desk)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(paper, be at on desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(newspaper, be at office)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be at desk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(newspaper, be at desk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(newspaper, be at desk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(newspaper, be at desk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(newspaper, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(paper, be at office)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(paper, be at on desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be at office)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(paper, be at desk)