newspaper: be bad for environment

Related concepts

Parents	periodical Weight: 0.64 , television station Weight: 0.64 , media Weight: 0.61 , employer Weight: 0.61 , publication Weight: 0.61
Siblings	paper Weight: 0.68 , newsweek Weight: 0.64 , magazine Weight: 0.64 , daily Weight: 0.61 , herald Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be bad for environment	1.00
has quality good	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(paper, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(magazine, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(paper, be bad for environment)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(magazine, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(magazine, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(paper, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(paper, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(newspaper, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(newspaper, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(newspaper, has quality good)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(newspaper, has quality good)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(newspaper, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(newspaper, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(magazine, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(paper, has quality good)