newt: be scamander in azkaban

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amphibian
Weight: 0.66
, politician
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.59
, species
Weight: 0.57
, republican
Weight: 0.55
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.35
, frog
Weight: 0.35
, salamander
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be scamander in azkaban 1.00
be scamander hufflepuff 0.88
be anti-romney 0.88
have obscurus 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(newt, be scamander in azkaban)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(newt, be anti-romney)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(newt, be anti-romney)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(newt, be anti-romney)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(newt, be anti-romney)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(newt, be scamander hufflepuff)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(newt, have obscurus)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(newt, have obscurus)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(newt, have obscurus)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(newt, have obscurus)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(newt, be scamander hufflepuff)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(newt, be scamander hufflepuff)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(newt, be scamander hufflepuff)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(newt, be scamander in azkaban)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(newt, be scamander in azkaban)