newt: be scamander in new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amphibian
Weight: 0.66
, politician
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.59
, species
Weight: 0.57
, republican
Weight: 0.55
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.35
, frog
Weight: 0.35
, salamander
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be scamander in new york 1.00
go to new york 0.98
be scamander in york 0.98
go to york 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(newt, be scamander in new york)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(newt, go to new york)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(newt, go to york)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(newt, be scamander in york)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(newt, go to new york)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(newt, be scamander in york)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(newt, go to york)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(newt, go to york)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(newt, go to new york)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(newt, be scamander in york)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(newt, be scamander in york)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(newt, go to new york)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(newt, go to york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(newt, be scamander in new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(newt, be scamander in new york)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(newt, be scamander in new york)