newt: have obscurus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amphibian
Weight: 0.66
, politician
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.59
, species
Weight: 0.57
, republican
Weight: 0.55
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.35
, frog
Weight: 0.35
, salamander
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have obscurus 1.00
have take 0.81
be scamander in azkaban 0.77
be scamander hufflepuff 0.76
be anti-romney 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(newt, have obscurus)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(newt, be anti-romney)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(newt, be anti-romney)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(newt, be anti-romney)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(newt, be anti-romney)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(newt, have take)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(newt, be scamander hufflepuff)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(newt, have take)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(newt, have take)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(newt, be scamander in azkaban)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(newt, have take)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(newt, be scamander hufflepuff)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(newt, be scamander hufflepuff)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(newt, be scamander hufflepuff)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(newt, have obscurus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(newt, have obscurus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(newt, have obscurus)