nickel: be more electrically conductive than iron

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.63
, metal
Weight: 0.61
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings copper
Weight: 0.35
, molybdenum
Weight: 0.35
, zinc
Weight: 0.35
, tantalum
Weight: 0.35
, cobalt
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more electrically conductive than iron 1.00
is magnetic metal 0.83
react with iron oxide 0.82
is magnetic 0.81
be included in electrodes 0.80
have 10 valence electrons 0.80
have 2 valence electrons 0.80
be more reactive than copper 0.78
be electroplated industrially 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(material, is magnetic)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(metal, is magnetic)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(metal, is magnetic)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(material, is magnetic)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(material, is magnetic)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(metal, is magnetic)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cobalt, is magnetic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(material, is magnetic)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(metal, is magnetic)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(cobalt, is magnetic)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cobalt, is magnetic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nickel, is magnetic metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(nickel, is magnetic metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nickel, is magnetic metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nickel, react with iron oxide)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(nickel, react with iron oxide)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nickel, is magnetic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nickel, is magnetic metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nickel, have 10 valence electrons)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(nickel, have 2 valence electrons)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(nickel, have 10 valence electrons)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(nickel, is magnetic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(nickel, is magnetic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(nickel, have 2 valence electrons)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(nickel, have 10 valence electrons)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(nickel, react with iron oxide)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(nickel, have 2 valence electrons)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickel, is magnetic)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(nickel, be electroplated industrially)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be more reactive than copper)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(nickel, be more reactive than copper)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(nickel, be electroplated industrially)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nickel, react with iron oxide)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(nickel, be more reactive than copper)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nickel, have 10 valence electrons)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nickel, have 2 valence electrons)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(nickel, be electroplated industrially)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nickel, be more reactive than copper)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be electroplated industrially)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(metal, is magnetic)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(material, is magnetic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cobalt, is magnetic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(metal, is magnetic)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nickel, be more electrically conductive than iron)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(material, is magnetic)