nickelodeon: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents channel
Weight: 0.62
, brand
Weight: 0.61
, network
Weight: 0.60
, company
Weight: 0.59
, tv show
Weight: 0.56
Siblings spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.64
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.34
, computer network
Weight: 0.33
, soap opera
Weight: 0.33
, simpsons
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is bad now 0.84
has quality evil 0.80
make bad shows 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is bad now)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, is bad now)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(simpsons, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(simpsons, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(simpsons, is bad now)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cartoon network, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, is bad now)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(nickelodeon, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(nickelodeon, is bad now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(nickelodeon, is bad now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nickelodeon, is bad now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, is bad now)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, make bad shows)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(nickelodeon, make bad shows)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(nickelodeon, make bad shows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nickelodeon, make bad shows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nickelodeon, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(simpsons, is bad now)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cartoon network, is bad now)