niger: be in poverty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.51
, region
Weight: 0.47
, state
Weight: 0.41
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.33
, mali
Weight: 0.33
, equatorial guinea
Weight: 0.33
, zambia
Weight: 0.33
, antarctica
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in poverty 1.00
have poverty 0.99
live in poverty 0.97
has state poverty 0.97
is impoverished 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(zambia, be in poverty)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, be in poverty)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mali, be in poverty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mali, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mali, be in poverty)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(zambia, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(zambia, be in poverty)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central african republic, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(central african republic, be in poverty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(niger, be in poverty)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(niger, live in poverty)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(niger, has state poverty)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(niger, have poverty)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(niger, live in poverty)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(niger, has state poverty)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(niger, live in poverty)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(niger, has state poverty)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(niger, has state poverty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(niger, live in poverty)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(niger, have poverty)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(niger, have poverty)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(niger, is impoverished)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(niger, is impoverished)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(niger, is impoverished)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(niger, is impoverished)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(niger, have poverty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(niger, be in poverty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(niger, be in poverty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(zambia, be in poverty)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mali, be in poverty)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(niger, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(central african republic, be in poverty)