niger: has state poverty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.51
, region
Weight: 0.47
, state
Weight: 0.41
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.33
, mali
Weight: 0.33
, equatorial guinea
Weight: 0.33
, zambia
Weight: 0.33
, antarctica
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state poverty 1.00
have poverty 0.97
be in poverty 0.97
live in poverty 0.94
is impoverished 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(zambia, be in poverty)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, be in poverty)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mali, be in poverty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mali, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mali, be in poverty)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(zambia, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(zambia, be in poverty)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central african republic, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(central african republic, be in poverty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(niger, has state poverty)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(niger, live in poverty)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(niger, live in poverty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(niger, have poverty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(niger, live in poverty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(niger, be in poverty)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(niger, be in poverty)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(niger, be in poverty)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(niger, live in poverty)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(niger, have poverty)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(niger, be in poverty)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(niger, have poverty)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(niger, is impoverished)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(niger, is impoverished)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(niger, is impoverished)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(niger, is impoverished)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(niger, have poverty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(niger, has state poverty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(niger, has state poverty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(zambia, be in poverty)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mali, be in poverty)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(niger, has state poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(central african republic, be in poverty)