nightclub: be at manhattan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, attraction
Weight: 0.51
Siblings warehouse
Weight: 0.59
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.36
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at manhattan 1.00
be at chicago 0.78
be at boston 0.78
be at berkeley 0.78
be at new york city 0.76
be at new york 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nightclub, be at manhattan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(nightclub, be at manhattan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(nightclub, be at manhattan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nightclub, be at manhattan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nightclub, be at manhattan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at berkeley)