nightclub: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	restaurant Weight: 0.63 , establishment Weight: 0.61 , place Weight: 0.58 , thing Weight: 0.53
Siblings	steakhouse Weight: 0.36 , italian restaurant Weight: 0.35 , seafood restaurant Weight: 0.35 , fast food restaurant Weight: 0.34 , chinese restaurant Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
has quality worth	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(establishment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(nightclub, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(establishment, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(establishment, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(establishment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(nightclub, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(nightclub, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(nightclub, has quality good)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(nightclub, has quality good)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(nightclub, has quality good)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(nightclub, has quality worth)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(nightclub, has quality worth)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(nightclub, has quality worth)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(nightclub, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nightclub, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(nightclub, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(nightclub, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(establishment, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(nightclub, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(establishment, has quality bad)