nike: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.62
, shoe
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.61
, client
Weight: 0.55
, name
Weight: 0.54
Siblings chanel
Weight: 0.34
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, hermes
Weight: 0.34
, oxford
Weight: 0.34
, burberry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be bad for environment 0.80
be bad running 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nike, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(client, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(client, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(nike, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(nike, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(nike, be bad running)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(nike, be bad running)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(nike, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(nike, be bad running)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nike, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(nike, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(nike, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(nike, be bad running)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(nike, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nike, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(client, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(nike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(client, has quality bad)