nirvana: be considered great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents band
Weight: 0.61
, state
Weight: 0.59
, group
Weight: 0.58
, artist
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings nevermind
Weight: 0.35
, oasis
Weight: 0.33
, enlightenment
Weight: 0.32
, immortality
Weight: 0.32
, eternity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered great 1.00
be considered by many 0.81
has quality good 0.77
is like 0.76
is amazing 0.75
is big 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(state, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nirvana, be considered great)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nirvana, be considered great)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(band, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nirvana, be considered great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(band, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(group, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(state, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(state, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(oasis, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(eternity, is like)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(enlightenment, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(enlightenment, is like)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(state, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(band, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(enlightenment, is like)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(enlightenment, is like)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(eternity, is like)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(eternity, is like)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(enlightenment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(enlightenment, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(oasis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(oasis, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(nirvana, be considered great)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nirvana, be considered by many)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(nirvana, is like)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(nirvana, be considered by many)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(nirvana, be considered by many)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(nirvana, is like)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered by many)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(nirvana, is amazing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, is big)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(nirvana, is like)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, is amazing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(nirvana, is amazing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, is like)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nirvana, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(nirvana, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(nirvana, is amazing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(nirvana, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(nirvana, is big)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(nirvana, is big)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(nirvana, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nirvana, be considered great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(band, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(state, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(enlightenment, is like)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(eternity, is like)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(enlightenment, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(oasis, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(band, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(state, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(nirvana, be considered great)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good)