no: be defined as opposite of yes

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.60
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, player
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, hit
Weight: 0.55
Siblings nothing
Weight: 0.34
, anybody
Weight: 0.33
, little
Weight: 0.32
, anything
Weight: 0.32
, whatever
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be defined as opposite of yes 1.00
mean yes 0.86
be at we do not understand 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(no, be defined as opposite of yes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at we do not understand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(no, be defined as opposite of yes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(no, be defined as opposite of yes)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(no, mean yes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(no, mean yes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(no, mean yes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(no, mean yes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(no, be defined as opposite of yes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(no, be defined as opposite of yes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(no, be defined as opposite of yes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)