no: be in notation important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.60
, free radical
Weight: 0.60
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, player
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings nothing
Weight: 0.34
, any
Weight: 0.34
, anybody
Weight: 0.33
, only
Weight: 0.33
, f word
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in notation important 1.00
be in notation 0.98
be in notation important in science 0.94
be in scientific notation important 0.92
be in scientific notation 0.90
be in scientific notation important in science 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(no, be in notation important)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(no, be in notation)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(no, be in notation)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(no, be in notation)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(no, be in notation)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(no, be in scientific notation)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(no, be in scientific notation important)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(no, be in scientific notation)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(no, be in scientific notation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(no, be in scientific notation important in science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(no, be in scientific notation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(no, be in notation important in science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(no, be in notation important in science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(no, be in scientific notation important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(no, be in scientific notation important in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(no, be in scientific notation important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(no, be in notation important in science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(no, be in scientific notation important in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(no, be in notation important in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(no, be in scientific notation important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(no, be in scientific notation important in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(no, be in notation important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(no, be in notation important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(no, be in notation important)