noise: be called white noise

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loud noise
Weight: 0.69
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, behavior
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.58
Siblings loud music
Weight: 0.71
, alarm clock
Weight: 0.67
, vacuum cleaner
Weight: 0.66
, jitter
Weight: 0.62
, siren
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called white noise 1.00
be called noise 0.95
be called pink noise 0.94
has quality noises 0.80
has color white 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(loud noise, has quality noises)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(noise, be called white noise)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(loud noise, has quality noises)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loud noise, has quality noises)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(loud noise, has quality noises)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(noise, be called white noise)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(noise, be called white noise)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(noise, be called noise)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(noise, be called noise)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(noise, be called noise)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(noise, be called pink noise)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(noise, be called pink noise)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(noise, be called pink noise)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(noise, has quality noises)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(noise, has quality noises)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(noise, has quality noises)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(noise, be called pink noise)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(noise, has color white)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(noise, has color white)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(noise, has color white)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has color white)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(noise, be called noise)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality noises)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(noise, be called white noise)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(noise, be called white noise)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(loud noise, has quality noises)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(noise, be called white noise)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(loud noise, has quality noises)