noise: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loud noise
Weight: 0.69
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, behavior
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.58
Siblings loud music
Weight: 0.71
, alarm clock
Weight: 0.67
, vacuum cleaner
Weight: 0.66
, jitter
Weight: 0.62
, siren
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
be better than quantity 0.77
has quality definition 0.76
be bad on snapchat 0.76
be bad on instagram 0.76
be good in school 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(noise, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(behavior, be good in school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(noise, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(noise, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(noise, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(noise, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(behavior, be good in school)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be good in school)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(jitter, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(jitter, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(noise, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(behavior, be good in school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(noise, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(noise, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(noise, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(noise, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(jitter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(jitter, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(jitter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(jitter, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(noise, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(noise, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(behavior, be good in school)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(jitter, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(jitter, has quality definition)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(noise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(behavior, be good in school)