noodle: taste different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, chinese food
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings ramen
Weight: 0.42
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, soup
Weight: 0.34
, pretzel
Weight: 0.34
, potato chip
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste different 1.00
taste good 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste different)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(potato chip, taste good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(noodle, taste different)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(noodle, taste good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(noodle, taste good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(noodle, taste good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(noodle, taste different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste different)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)