normalization: be needed in design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.58
, transformation
Weight: 0.55
, tool
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cooperation
Weight: 0.32
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, recovery
Weight: 0.31
, extraction
Weight: 0.31
, democracy
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed in design 1.00
be needed in design of database 0.85
is needed 0.82
be required in database design 0.81
be regarded as design approach 0.80
be regarded as bottom-up design approach 0.80
be important in database design 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(normalization, be needed in design)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(normalization, is needed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(normalization, is needed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(normalization, be important in database design)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important in database design)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(normalization, is needed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design of database)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(normalization, be important in database design)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(normalization, be regarded as design approach)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(normalization, be required in database design)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(normalization, be regarded as design approach)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(normalization, be required in database design)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(normalization, be regarded as design approach)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be regarded as design approach)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(normalization, be required in database design)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(normalization, is needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(normalization, be needed in design)