normalization: be needed in design of database

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.58
, transformation
Weight: 0.55
, tool
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cooperation
Weight: 0.32
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, recovery
Weight: 0.31
, extraction
Weight: 0.31
, democracy
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed in design of database 1.00
be required in database design 0.97
be important in database design 0.97
be required in database 0.91
be important in database 0.90
be important for databases 0.85
be needed in design 0.85
be important for relational databases 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(normalization, be important in database design)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(normalization, be important in database design)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(normalization, be required in database design)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(normalization, be required in database design)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(normalization, be required in database)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(normalization, be required in database design)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important in database design)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(normalization, be required in database)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(normalization, be important in database)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(normalization, be required in database)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(normalization, be needed in design)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(normalization, be important for databases)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(normalization, be important in database)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(normalization, be needed in design)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(normalization, be important in database)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(normalization, be needed in design)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(normalization, be important for databases)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(normalization, be important for relational databases)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(normalization, be important for databases)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(normalization, be important for relational databases)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(normalization, be important for relational databases)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important for databases)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important in database)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important for relational databases)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design of database)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)