normalization: be regarded as bottom-up design approach

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.58
, transformation
Weight: 0.55
, tool
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cooperation
Weight: 0.32
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, recovery
Weight: 0.31
, extraction
Weight: 0.31
, democracy
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be regarded as design approach 1.00
be regarded as bottom-up design approach 1.00
be needed in design 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(normalization, be regarded as design approach)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(normalization, be regarded as design approach)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(normalization, be regarded as design approach)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be regarded as design approach)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(normalization, be needed in design)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(normalization, be needed in design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(normalization, be needed in design)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(normalization, be regarded as bottom-up design approach)