normalization: be required in database design

Related concepts

Parents	operation Weight: 0.58 , transformation Weight: 0.55 , tool Weight: 0.55 , concept Weight: 0.54 , issue Weight: 0.52
Siblings	cooperation Weight: 0.32 , integration Weight: 0.31 , recovery Weight: 0.31 , extraction Weight: 0.31 , democracy Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be required in database design	1.00
be needed in design of database	0.97
be important in database design	0.96
be required in database	0.95
be important in database	0.89
be important for databases	0.85
be needed in design	0.81
be important for relational databases	0.80
is required	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(concept, is required) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(normalization, be required in database design)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(transformation, is required) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(normalization, be required in database design)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(transformation, is required)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(concept, is required)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(concept, is required)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(transformation, is required)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(concept, is required) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(normalization, be required in database design)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(transformation, is required) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(normalization, be required in database design)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(normalization, be required in database design)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(normalization, be required in database)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(normalization, be important in database design)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(normalization, be important in database design)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important in database design)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(normalization, is required)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(normalization, be required in database)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(normalization, is required)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(normalization, be important in database)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(normalization, be important for databases)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(normalization, be needed in design)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(normalization, be required in database)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design of database)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(normalization, be important for relational databases)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(normalization, is required)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(normalization, be needed in design)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(normalization, be important in database)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(normalization, be important for databases)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(normalization, be needed in design)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(normalization, be important in database)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(normalization, be important for databases)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important for databases)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important for relational databases)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important in database)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(normalization, be important for relational databases)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(normalization, be important for relational databases)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(normalization, is required)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(normalization, be required in database design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(transformation, is required)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(concept, is required)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(transformation, is required)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(normalization, be required in database design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(concept, is required)