north dakota: have internet service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south dakota
Weight: 0.89
, area
Weight: 0.69
, region
Weight: 0.67
, south
Weight: 0.66
Siblings bismarck
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.40
, south carolina
Weight: 0.39
, north
Weight: 0.38
, west
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have internet service 1.00
have internet 0.91
have awesome internet service 0.91
have slow internet 0.84
is online banking 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(region, is online banking)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(north dakota, have internet service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(region, is online banking)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(region, is online banking)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(region, is online banking)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(north dakota, have internet service)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(north dakota, have internet service)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(north dakota, have awesome internet service)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(north dakota, have awesome internet service)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(north dakota, have awesome internet service)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(north dakota, have awesome internet service)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(north dakota, have internet service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(north dakota, have internet service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(region, is online banking)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(north dakota, have internet service)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(region, is online banking)