north pole: have seasons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south pole
Weight: 0.86
, area
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.64
, pole
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.60
Siblings telephone pole
Weight: 0.39
, north
Weight: 0.37
, south
Weight: 0.37
, west
Weight: 0.36
, south park
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have seasons 1.00
have different seasons 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(north pole, have seasons)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pole, have different seasons)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pole, have different seasons)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(north pole, have seasons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(north pole, have seasons)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(north pole, have different seasons)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(north pole, have different seasons)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(north pole, have different seasons)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(north pole, have different seasons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(north pole, have seasons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(north pole, have seasons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pole, have different seasons)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pole, have different seasons)