nos: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.52
, brand
Weight: 0.50
Siblings toyota
Weight: 0.31
, audi
Weight: 0.31
, burberry
Weight: 0.30
, mitsubishi
Weight: 0.30
, hyundai
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good quality 0.98
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
has quality worth 0.85
is new good 0.83
feel good 0.80
has quality resource 0.79
has quality organization 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nos, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(journal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nos, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(journal, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nos, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(journal, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(journal, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(journal, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(journal, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(audi, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(audi, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hyundai, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(burberry, is good quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(burberry, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(burberry, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(burberry, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(nos, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(journal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(nos, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(journal, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(nos, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(toyota, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(toyota, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(burberry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(burberry, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(audi, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(audi, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(burberry, is good quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(burberry, is good quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hyundai, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hyundai, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(burberry, is quality)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(burberry, is quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(audi, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(audi, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(burberry, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(burberry, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(toyota, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(toyota, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mitsubishi, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(mitsubishi, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(nos, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(nos, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(nos, has quality better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(nos, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(nos, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(nos, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(nos, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(nos, feel good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(nos, feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(nos, feel good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(nos, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nos, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(journal, has quality resource)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(journal, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mitsubishi, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(burberry, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(burberry, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(burberry, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(burberry, is good quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mitsubishi, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hyundai, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(audi, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(audi, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(journal, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(nos, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(journal, has quality resource)