nos: has state office

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.52
, brand
Weight: 0.50
Siblings toyota
Weight: 0.31
, audi
Weight: 0.31
, burberry
Weight: 0.30
, mitsubishi
Weight: 0.30
, hyundai
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state office 1.00
has state company 0.78
has state last 0.78
has state end 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(burberry, has state end)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has state company)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hyundai, has state last)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(burberry, has state end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(burberry, has state end)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hyundai, has state last) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hyundai, has state last)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(toyota, has state company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(toyota, has state company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(nos, has state office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(nos, has state office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nos, has state office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(burberry, has state end)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(toyota, has state company)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(nos, has state office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(hyundai, has state last)