note: keep freezing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents negotiable instrument
Weight: 0.63
, addition
Weight: 0.63
, message
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings eighth note
Weight: 0.68
, quarter note
Weight: 0.64
, whole note
Weight: 0.63
, rose
Weight: 0.60
, tangerine
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
keep freezing 1.00
keep up freezing 0.97
affect freezing point 0.88
freeze 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(addition, affect freezing point)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(note, keep freezing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(addition, affect freezing point)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(addition, affect freezing point)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(addition, affect freezing point)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(note, keep freezing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(note, keep freezing)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(note, keep up freezing)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(note, keep up freezing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(note, keep up freezing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(note, keep up freezing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(note, keep freezing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(note, keep freezing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(addition, affect freezing point)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(note, keep freezing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(addition, affect freezing point)