notebook: has paper

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.64
, product
Weight: 0.62
, device
Weight: 0.62
, laptop
Weight: 0.60
, computer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.38
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35
, computer disk
Weight: 0.34
, notepad
Weight: 0.34
, motherboard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has paper 1.00
be made of paper 0.86
be piece of paper 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(notepad, has paper)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(notepad, be piece of paper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(notepad, has paper)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(notepad, has paper)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(notepad, be piece of paper)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(notepad, be piece of paper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(notebook, has paper)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(notebook, be made of paper)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be made of paper)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(notebook, be made of paper)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(notebook, be made of paper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(notebook, has paper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(notebook, has paper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(notepad, has paper)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(notebook, has paper)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(notepad, be piece of paper)