nuclear fission: be better than fusion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.55
, process
Weight: 0.50
, source
Weight: 0.50
Siblings nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.36
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.36
, atomic bomb
Weight: 0.34
, atomic clock
Weight: 0.34
, nuke
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than fusion 1.00
be easier than fusion 0.94
be different from fusion 0.93
be similar to fusion 0.92
be better than nuclear fusion 0.91
be used instead of fusion 0.91
be called fusion 0.91
related from fusion 0.89
be preferred to fusion 0.89
produce more energy than nuclear fusion 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be called fusion)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be used instead of fusion)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, be used instead of fusion)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be easier than fusion)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be used instead of fusion)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be preferred to fusion)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be different from fusion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be similar to fusion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than nuclear fusion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, be called fusion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be similar to fusion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be different from fusion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, be different from fusion)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, related from fusion)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be called fusion)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, be similar to fusion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, produce more energy than nuclear fusion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be different from fusion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, be easier than fusion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be better than nuclear fusion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be similar to fusion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, be better than nuclear fusion)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be easier than fusion)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, related from fusion)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, produce more energy than nuclear fusion)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be easier than fusion)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, be preferred to fusion)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, related from fusion)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, related from fusion)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, produce more energy than nuclear fusion)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, produce more energy than nuclear fusion)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be used instead of fusion)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be called fusion)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than nuclear fusion)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be preferred to fusion)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be preferred to fusion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be better than fusion)