nuclear fission: be more economically viable than fuel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.55
, process
Weight: 0.50
, source
Weight: 0.50
Siblings nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.36
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.36
, atomic bomb
Weight: 0.34
, atomic clock
Weight: 0.34
, nuke
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more economically viable than fuel 1.00
be more economically viable than fossil fuel 0.95
is desirable energy source 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fossil fuel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fossil fuel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fossil fuel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fossil fuel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, is desirable energy source)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, is desirable energy source)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, is desirable energy source)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, is desirable energy source)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be more economically viable than fuel)