nuclear power plant: be considered nonrenewable energy source

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.85
, power plant
Weight: 0.72
, facility
Weight: 0.71
, power
Weight: 0.71
, chemical
Weight: 0.68
Siblings chemical plant
Weight: 0.40
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.40
, water plant
Weight: 0.38
, hydro
Weight: 0.37
, nuclear fission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered nonrenewable energy source 1.00
be considered energy source 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)