nuclear power plant: be considered threat to security

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.85
, power plant
Weight: 0.72
, facility
Weight: 0.71
, power
Weight: 0.71
, chemical
Weight: 0.68
Siblings chemical plant
Weight: 0.40
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.40
, water plant
Weight: 0.38
, hydro
Weight: 0.37
, nuclear fission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered threat to security 1.00
threat to security 0.97
be considered threat 0.93
be considered threat to ecological security 0.92
threat to ecological security 0.90
pose threat to life 0.85
pose threat to aquatic life 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, be considered threat to ecological security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, be considered threat to ecological security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, threat to security)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, threat to security)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, threat to ecological security)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, threat to security)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, threat to ecological security)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, pose threat to life)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, threat to ecological security)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, threat to security)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, pose threat to life)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, threat to ecological security)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, pose threat to life)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, pose threat to life)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)