nuclear power plant: is cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.85
, power plant
Weight: 0.72
, facility
Weight: 0.71
, power
Weight: 0.71
, chemical
Weight: 0.68
Siblings chemical plant
Weight: 0.40
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.40
, water plant
Weight: 0.38
, hydro
Weight: 0.37
, nuclear fission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheap 1.00
is expensive 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(power plant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is cheap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(facility, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(power plant, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(facility, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(power plant, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water plant, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(power plant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, is cheap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(water plant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(water plant, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, is cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(power plant, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(water plant, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(power plant, is expensive)