nuclear reactor: be located near lakes in georgia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power plant
Weight: 0.69
, technology
Weight: 0.63
, system
Weight: 0.62
Siblings plutonium
Weight: 0.65
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.40
, nuclear fission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be located near lakes in georgia 1.00
be located near lakes 0.92
have located near water 0.86
have located 0.80
is near water 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, have located)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, have located)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)