nuclear reactor: cooling towers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power plant
Weight: 0.69
, technology
Weight: 0.63
, system
Weight: 0.62
Siblings plutonium
Weight: 0.65
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.40
, nuclear fission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
cooling towers 1.00
need cooling 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(power plant, cooling towers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(power plant, need cooling)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(power plant, cooling towers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, need cooling)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, need cooling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, need cooling)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, need cooling)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, need cooling)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, need cooling)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, cooling towers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power plant, need cooling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, need cooling)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, cooling towers)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power plant, need cooling)