nuclear reactor: have located

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power plant
Weight: 0.69
, technology
Weight: 0.63
, system
Weight: 0.62
Siblings plutonium
Weight: 0.65
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.40
, nuclear fission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have located 1.00
have located near water 0.91
be located near lakes 0.85
be located near lakes in georgia 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, have located)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, have located near water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, have located)